Solved! Re: [Gllug] ps2pdf quality
Pete Ryland
pdr at pdr.cx
Tue Dec 11 20:03:06 UTC 2001
non-free ghostscript could also be an option. It's always one year ahead of
the free release.
Pete
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:43:05PM +0000, Rev Simon Rumble wrote:
> On Tue 11 Dec, Rev Simon Rumble made the following spurious claims:
>
> > So now I can print from Windows machines here at work and have a
> > lovely PDF sitting on a file server seconds later. However the
> > quality of ps2pdf leaves a bit to be desired. In particular the fonts
> > look really heavy on-screen but print perfectly.
>
> Have worked out the problem. The machine this is running on is
> currently on the very outdated Debian stable and so contains a way old
> Ghostscript. Doing it on my (unstable) machine at home produced
> beautiful output and smaller files to boot. I'll upgrade the machine
> to testing (which has the same version as unstable at the moment)...
>
> --
> Rev Simon Rumble <simon at rumble.net>
> www.rumble.net
>
> What a country calls its vital economic interests are not
> the things which enable its citizens to live, but the
> things which enable it to make war.
>
> - Simone Weil
>
> --
> Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
> http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20011211/4a1d82d4/attachment.pgp>
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list