Solved! Re: [Gllug] ps2pdf quality

Pete Ryland pdr at pdr.cx
Tue Dec 11 20:03:06 UTC 2001


non-free ghostscript could also be an option.  It's always one year ahead of
the free release.

Pete

On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:43:05PM +0000, Rev Simon Rumble wrote:
> On Tue 11 Dec, Rev Simon Rumble made the following spurious claims:
> 
> > So now I can print from Windows machines here at work and have a
> > lovely PDF sitting on a file server seconds later.  However the
> > quality of ps2pdf leaves a bit to be desired.  In particular the fonts
> > look really heavy on-screen but print perfectly.
> 
> Have worked out the problem.  The machine this is running on is
> currently on the very outdated Debian stable and so contains a way old
> Ghostscript.  Doing it on my (unstable) machine at home produced
> beautiful output and smaller files to boot.  I'll upgrade the machine
> to testing (which has the same version as unstable at the moment)...
> 
> -- 
> Rev Simon Rumble <simon at rumble.net>
> www.rumble.net
> 
> What a country calls its vital economic interests are not
> the things which enable its citizens to live, but the
> things which enable it to make war.
> 
> - Simone Weil
> 
> -- 
> Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
> http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20011211/4a1d82d4/attachment.pgp>


More information about the GLLUG mailing list