[Gllug] X-Spam-Status

Nix nix at esperi.demon.co.uk
Tue Apr 2 21:18:40 UTC 2002

On 28 Mar 2002, Mark Lowes yowled:
> Debian unstable latest.  It's setup as spamc/d and I'm using the same
> daemon.  On what evidence are you basing that it's not doing all the
> tests?

Wrong evidence, I think.

I saw these...

 44 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.5 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.1
 22 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.1
  5 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.8 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,NO_REAL_NAME version=2.1

and thought `hang on, why are no rules firing?'

But some are, after all:

  3 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=EXCUSE_16 version=2.1
  2 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK version=2.1
  2 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.0 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK version=2.1
  2 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK version=2.1
  1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM,RCVD_IN_RFCI version=2.1
  1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.5 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM version=2.1
  1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,NO_REAL_NAME,SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK version=2.1
  1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_HAS_Q_MARK version=2.1
  1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3D-13.5 required=3D5.0 tests=3DIN_REP_TO version=3D=
  1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=DEAR_SOMEBODY version=2.1

I guess I'm being thrown off by my use of the AWL; things look odd to me
with *no* hits at all... :)

`Unless they've moved it since I last checked, travelling between
 England and America does not involve crossing the equator.'
   --- pir

Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk

More information about the GLLUG mailing list