[Gllug] Swap file size

David Damerell damerell at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Thu Jan 31 15:44:23 UTC 2002


On Thursday, 31 Jan 2002, Darran D. Rimron-Molloy wrote:
>I have been thinking this exact same thought recently - when machines
>with 64meg of RAM were considered beefy, and 128meg was overkill,
>RAMx2=SWAP seemed sensible, considering swap partitions could only be
>127meg at this time, it also made alot of sense....
>But what is the ruling with "modern" machines?

Linus now says that swap must be >= 2xRAM; apparently the very
infrequent failures not having this can create with 2.2 kernels are
much more likely with 2.4 kernels.

-- 
David Damerell <damerell at chiark.greenend.org.uk> flcl?

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug




More information about the GLLUG mailing list