[Gllug] Bad websites
David Pashley
david at parguild.co.uk
Sun Feb 23 16:42:44 UTC 2003
Formi said, and I quote:
>
> Isn't fooling the web servers a bit counter-productive, you are only
> giving them more ammunition for their pathetic excuse "101% of the
> browsers are IE".
>
> I always check the *nuke based sites for statistics and most of the
> time the most used browser is IE even in the site is only about
> GPL software. Which sounds to me like way too many people are using
> those "get around problem tactics" that solve nothing.
Yes I suppose I am, but then I tend to complain to webmaster at domain when
ever possible. Konqueror can set the user agent on a per domain bias,
and I ony have 3 options in there atm. It is particularly useful for
proving that the site does actually work in my browser.
I do agree that it isn't the best solution.
[snip]
--
David Pashley
david at davidpashley.com
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20030223/48054555/attachment.pgp>
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list