[Gllug] sparc 227terabyte disk size oddness
Nix
nix at esperi.demon.co.uk
Wed Jul 30 21:02:52 UTC 2003
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Martin A. Brooks muttered drunkenly:
> At 00:19 30/07/2003, you wrote:
>> > Did you also upgrade all the tools that were linked against the older glibc?
>>
>>You certainly shouldn't need to do that.
>
> Well, as doing so fixed the problem....
I boggle. That is *really* not supposed to happen.
Possibly a move from non-LFS to LFS was going on, and you got bitten by
having some parts of the system built LFS (with 64-bit file pointers and
sizes) and some parts built non-LFS (with file pointers and sizes only
32-bit).
--
`We cannot get a new line down the pipe due to a blockage and we cannot
dig up the road to clear the blockage because it is covered with the
wrong type of tarmac.' --- British Telecom, via Mark Lowes
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list