[Gllug] New twist in SCO saga

[Christopher Hunter]

On Sunday 15 Jun 2003 10:59 pm, Alistair Mann wrote:

> It's a common misconception, but it isn't true that one has to actually
> trade on inside information in order to commit an offence. In fact,
> propagation of inside information can count as it is 'likely to cause a
> market distortion'. (Financial Services and Market Act 2000, Section
> 118-2c.)
>
> But that digression is not really topical. Topical is that no-one here will
> trade SCOX because OP's friend has not forwarded his 'verified' evidence of
> GPL violation to the EFF (or has he?). It's a simple truth issue.

AFAIK EFF have been made aware.  There are also "patent right" cases going on 
between SCO and some of their present and ex-employees.  The Caldera staff 
got a particularly bad deal!

Chris

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug