[Gllug] Red Hat 9.0
Nix
nix at esperi.demon.co.uk
Sat Mar 29 01:27:08 UTC 2003
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Tethys yowled:
>
> Nix writes:
>>[1] for values of `they' equal to `mingo', and perhaps `drepper'
>
> Actually just mingo (Uli was testing thread startup times, but never had
> more than 50 running concurrently), and it was 100,000 concurrent threads,
I'm sure I saw mention somewhere of a 10-megathread test --- or maybe it
was `we didn't do this because it would have required insane amounts of
memory'.
> not millions. But still impressive all the same, and *way* more than any
> real life application will ever need.
I dunno, I'm sure someone will find a use for that many.
--- of course, now, we'll see all-the-world's-a-Linux-box developers
turning out applications using thousands of threads and moaning because
they don't work elsewhere...
> Apparently the box was still usable
> and responsive with a load average well into 4 figures...
Um, wow.
We seem to have gone from semi-crappy thread support to ultra-stellar
thread support, all at once...
--
#ifdef USE_ISPTS_FLAG
} else { /* else pty, not pts */
#endif
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list