[Gllug] Spamassassin/spamd problem
Nix
nix at esperi.org.uk
Sun Dec 19 23:53:41 UTC 2004
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, Adrian McMenamin moaned:
> Somewhere along the way I have upset my spamassassin daemon because
> although it still reports autolearning in the header eg...
>
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.4 required=4.5
> tests=HTML_70_80,HTML_FONT_BIG,
> HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS,
> MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,
> NO_INVESTMENT,PORN_4,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,X_MESSAGE_INFO autolearn=no
Er, that means `I didn't autolearn'.
> version=2.64
You might want to upgrade to 3.02 at some point.
> (Spammers, don't cha just luv em?)
Er, no? :)
> It doesn't matter how high or how low the score is, nothing is
> classified either as spam or ham.
Well, um, that mail was classified as spam.
Bayes didn't seem to kick off, but it may just have classified things as
50% instead: SA 2.64 didn't differentiate between `error' and `can't
learn', so we can't tell from this.
Could you run the message through `spamasssin -D' and post the result?
> I can't see anything obvious in any of the config files and so i wonder
> if there is a heuristic out there that can help :(
Ask on the spamassassin-users mailing list?
--
`The sword we forged has turned upon us
Only now, at the end of all things do we see
The lamp-bearer dies; only the lamp burns on.'
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list