[Gllug] C++ Templates, Opinions?

[Richard Jones]

On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:01:37PM +0000, Ian Norton-Badrul wrote:
> I was just wondering what people though about using function/class
> templates in C++, To me it looks clever but like it could drastically
> reduce the readability of C++ code (ie find a func call, go looking for
> it in code, cant find it directly etc)

How about using a real language instead?

http://caml.inria.fr/
http://haskell.org/
http://www.gnu.org/software/gcl/gcl.html

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones.  http://www.annexia.org/  http://www.j-london.com/
>>>   http://www.team-notepad.com/ - collaboration tools for teams   <<<
Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - improving website return on investment
Use Perl libs in OCaml - http://www.merjis.com/developers/perl4caml
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20041216/b28c1fe7/attachment.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug