[Gllug] C++ Templates, Opinions?

mimo mimo at restoel.net
Fri Dec 17 10:41:02 UTC 2004


Ian Norton-Badrul wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I was just wondering what people though about using function/class
> templates in C++, To me it looks clever but like it could drastically
> reduce the readability of C++ code (ie find a func call, go looking for
> it in code, cant find it directly etc)
>
I guess it depends. If you get used to templating and stick to some 
rules about naming conventions etc. it should be fine. Think of STL 
which everyone now uses. I dont know about really mad stuff like loki 
and then there is boost which is completely unredable for my taste...

mimo


> Ian
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFBwhPRYtjiaBNXb0wRAgQEAKCdqXrL4Cp5+gLpk3heDuyDUsh48wCfftj4
> njrbSDUmqYonQUdNEhiDtdU=
> =yCeh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
Please note that this account is being filtered using anti UCE systems. If you send email to this account make sure that it could not be mistaken as UCE.

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug




More information about the GLLUG mailing list