[Gllug] Anyone using Linux 2.6.0 on production system?
James Bromberger
james at rcpt.to
Tue Jan 13 17:07:08 UTC 2004
Dale Gallagher (foobar at mighty.co.za) wrote:
> Is anyone using 2.6.0 on a production system? Need to find out if it's
> wise to go this route, or to stick to 2.4.24. Will be using Slackware
> 9.1 on an HP-DL380 with SmartArray 6402 RAID controller. There was a
> performance report I found a few weeks ago on the Net which clearly
> showed enormous benefits in moving to 2.6.0 (this was pre- 2.6.0
> stable), showing how it whipped 2.4.x and all other *NIX Open Source
> OS's. Busy trying to find that link again...
>
> Any experiences, suggestions etc. re: 2.6.0 would be appreciated.
Behind several firewalls I have:
$ uname -a
Linux gargantuan.nas.private.net 2.6.0-testxx #1 SMP Mon Dec 1 11:23:19
GMT 2003 i686 unknown
$ df -HT
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda3 ext3 2.1G 378M 1.5G 20% /
/dev/sda1 ext3 101M 17M 79M 18% /boot
/dev/sda5 ext3 4.7G 3.3G 1.2G 72% /usr
/dev/md5 reiserfs 3.5T 1.4T 2.1T 39% /mnt/big
Its a DNUK box with a good few disks.
http://www.james.rcpt.to/2003/20030715-fotango/IMG_1793-p.jpg
Yes, thats 3.5 terabytes in a single partition. Thats why its a 2.6
kernel. And its been rock solid (except for 2.6.0-test6 or so). And if
this were an optertron I could go to 8 PB, whereas since this is a P4
box, I can only go to 16 T.
So far, very happy with it. (plus, on my laptop, its been great since
before the textXX series.
James
--
James Bromberger <james_AT_rcpt.to> www.james.rcpt.to
Remainder moved to http://www.james.rcpt.to/james/sig.html
I am in London on UK mobile +44 7952 042920.
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list