[Gllug] Best option for a lot of compute power
Huw Lynes
huw-l at moving-picture.com
Mon Jun 7 08:21:29 UTC 2004
On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 17:27:12 +0100
John Winters <john at sinodun.org.uk> wrote:
> The front runner at the moment is Tablix, which has good support for
> running on a whole LAN-full of machines.
>
> I am therefore considering putting in a bid for a powerful multi-cpu
> workstation. The obvious choice seems to be between a couple of
> hyperthreaded processors (giving almost 4 effective processors)
hyper-threading has always sucked badly when we've bench-marked it. We turn it
off by default on all our Xeon boxes. If tablix has been compiled with icc you
might see a different story though.
> or a
> couple of AMD 64 bit processors.
Opterons are nice. Pound for pound they are faster than Xeon's.
If it's designed to run on a LAN full of machines it might be cheaper to buy 3
or 4 uniprocessor P4 boxes and run it across those.
On the other hand I would be tempted to use this as the perfect excuse to buy
a dual-opteron box.
--
| Huw Lynes | The Moving Picture Company |
| System Administrator | 127 Wardour Street |
|.........................| London, W1F 0NL |
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list