[Gllug] Best option for a lot of compute power

john at sinodun.org.uk john at sinodun.org.uk
Mon Jun 7 11:47:12 UTC 2004


> On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:04:57PM +0100, john at sinodun.org.uk wrote:
>> >
>> > Richard Jones writes:
>> >
>> >>Seriously though, have you looked at using a declarative language to
>> >>search through the space?  Prolog being the obvious choice.
>> >
>> > Yep, that was my first thought, too. Languages like Prolog are great
>> > at calculating best fit scenarios[1]. I'm also completely astounded
>> that
>> > anyone could seriously believe that calculating a school time table
>> would
>> > require significant amounts of compute power.
>>
>> I confess I don't know anything about Prolog and I'm new to the area of
>> timetables, but the idea that calculating school timetables (indeed, any
>> timetables) requires a lot of CPU seems fairly well established.  If
>> anyone can demonstrate a method which doesn't need a lot of CPU time you
>> should be able to make a killing.
>
> Genetic algorithms perhaps.  Horms did his undergrad thesis on using them
> for timetabling:

Yes, that's what Tablix uses - hence the need for lots of CPU time.

John
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug




More information about the GLLUG mailing list