[Gllug] DNS question
Nix
nix at esperi.org.uk
Fri Nov 5 11:39:04 UTC 2004
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Alain Williams moaned:
> I wanted to give a box several names, so I used CNAMEs:
>
> foo IN CNAME bar
> IN MX 10 foo
MXs shouldn't point to CNAMEs. (Indeed, *nothing* except for CNAMEs
should point to CNAMEs.)
RFC974 and RFC1912 recommend against it; but some people disagree:
<http://www.mengwong.com/misc/rfc1912-is-wrong.html>, the thread at
<http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0111/0000.html>.
> So, I am happy but would rather that foo was a CNAME for bar, it makes maintainance,
> etc, easier. Am I doing something wrong, or is this something fundemental that
> I have not understood ?
Er, why not just have two A records, one `foo', one `bar', with `bar's
current IP address?
(People really do tend to overuse CNAMEs, I feel.)
--
`Preliminary analysis reveal there are few impact craters on Titan. This
suggests Cassini has an active surface constantly being resurfaced.'
--- BBC News Online introduces a new planetary body
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list