[Gllug] Numpty Networking
john.hearns at clustervision.com
john.hearns at clustervision.com
Mon Nov 15 20:23:23 UTC 2004
Quoting Darren Beale <bealers at gmail.com>:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying without success to link two networks together by means of
> two machines with 2 NICs and a crossover cable, as illustrated below:
Hope this isn't a stupid reply, but
you don;t need the two amchines with two NICs.
The 10.0.7 network is unnecessary.
One machine with two NICs should be enough to route between two networks.
And, here I am showing my stupidity, why not stick with convention and use
10.0 networks as Class A's
192.168 as Class C's.
And, yes, I do know that Class A,B,C are meaningless these days with CIDR.
And have you enabled routing on machine B?
> Network A 10.0.1.0/24
> |
> | eth0: 10.0.1.110
> |
> ------|-----------
> |
> | Machine A
> |
> | Kernel IP routing table
> | Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> | 10.0.6.0 10.0.7.2 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth1
> | 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> | 0.0.0.0 10.0.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth0
> |
> ------------------
> |
> | eth1: 10.0.7.2
> |
> [Crossover cable]
> |
> | eth1: 10.0.7.1
> |
> ------|------------
> | Machine B |
> | Routing tables |
> | untouched so far |
> -------------------
> |
> | eth0: 10.0.6.101
> |
>
> Network B 10.0.6.0/24
>
>
> Note Machine A, I've created a static route to 10.0.6.0/24 by use of
> the command:
>
> route add -net 10.0.6.0/24 gw 10.0.7.2
>
> So from A -> B I would hope I could ping something on 10.0.6.0/24 from
> A but I can't (it just sits there), so I've obviously got something
> wrong, but what? The only thing that I can do is ping 10.0.7.[1|2]
> from the respective machines
>
> regs
>
> Darren
> --
> Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
> http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
>
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list