[Gllug] rma rejected + the worst grammer +ever+

[Nix]

On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Chris Bell moaned:
> On Thu 07 Jul, Nix wrote:
>> 
>> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Chris Bell stipulated:
>> > companies can afford to move difficult employees to other duties, perhaps
>> > somewhere a long distance from home, until the employee decides to resign.
>> 
>> Doing *that* (relocating you a long way away explicitly to try to force
>> you to resign) is illegal, IIRC.
>> 
>    Try telling that to governmental and public employers. Employment at any
> location specified by the employer is often a condition of employment. Staff
> are often "promoted" to a different part of the company, while an offer to
> re-locate to a different area of the country if refused may be a good enough
> reason for dismissal.

That's subtly different to relocating you *with intent and in
expectation that you will refuse and resign*.

But I've got all petty and legalistic. (It must be something in the air.)

-- 
`But of course, GR is the very best relativity for the masses.'
 --- Wayne Throop
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug