[Gllug] Poor disk performance on IDE raid
Simon Wilcox
essuu at ourshack.com
Fri Jun 3 09:42:54 UTC 2005
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> Not wishing to be harsh, but if your system relies on low latency I/O
> then you have barely picked a worse setup.
I agree but these are nodes in a web cluster so it's not critical, I was
just a little surprised to see it being quite so slow.
> If you want low latency with RAID then you need more spindles.
Indeed, I often have trouble explaining to the $client why it is better to
use more smaller disks than fewer big ones.
Simon.
--
"I'm not happy with my wash!"
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list