[Gllug] p2p programs

[Henry Gilbert]

On 11/13/05, Martin A. Brooks <martin at hinterlands.org> wrote:
> Henry Gilbert wrote:
> > wu-ftpd << SERVER
> >
> > and a bad choice of a server too.
>
> For Red Hat 6.x, and possible earlier, that was the default option.
>

You can either search desperately the 90's Linux archives to give an answer.
Or you can finally admit I got a point.
I am talking about today.
Who cares if version 0.0001 was hackable - it was fixed .. a LONG time ago.

> > i would be interested to know how to undo rm -fr * in reiserfs
>
> The same way as any other fs: you restore from your backup.
>

I thought of a similar construct: "Just don't do it in first place?"
no .. maybe not ...
I am not good at such verbal constructions

but I feel that for you winning an argument for you,
is more important than the actual "truth".

i like truths,
i am still digesting the "icmp echo reply" as default answer
now come to think of it
there are other public services as default
the question is = are they hackable
or better: have they been succesfully exploited
(and hence one horror story)

no horror story means:
Linux Desktop users can relax.
(Following good security measures still doesn't hurt)

But Windows users should quiet rightly
feel paranoid as they unaware
generate the incessant barrage of email spam.
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug