[Gllug] [OT] TFT displays
Chris Hunter
chrisehunter at blueyonder.co.uk
Sun Sep 25 13:36:45 UTC 2005
Adam Bower wrote:
> I have read that they are not broadcasting the new digital channels from
> any transmitters at anything like full power yet, apparently due to the
> risk of causing problems with the analogue channels+interference but
> once the switch over is underway then digital power will be boosted when
> the analogue is turned off.
No - digital TV requires very much less power than analogue.
> Indeed if I compare (perhaps incorrectly, I am not a radio engineer) the
> numbers for Crystal Palace on these 2 pages (first is Analogue, 2nd is
> Digital).
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/reception/transmitters/tv_trans/tv_crystal.shtml
> http://www.dtg.org.uk/retailer/tx_lse.html
>
> It seems like Crystal Palace is a whopping 1000kW for analogue and each
> digital multiplex gets 20kW... of course not all things are equal. Any
> radio engineers like to explain this?
See above - analogue broadcasting (both of radio and TV) require much
more power than digital for the same area coverage. The problem with
analogue is always signal-to-noise ratio - VHF and UHF signals always go
to the horizon, irrespective of power. A low power signal will have a
very poor S/N ratio at distance - higher power just improves S/N
(increasing useful range). The S/N ratio required for digital reception
is MUCH smaller than that required for analogue.
> (If I compare Talcolneston in East Anglia which is where my television
> comes from right now it claims 250kW for Analogue and 10kW or 5kW for
> the digital channels.)
That's about right, based on the S/N requirements for each.
Chris
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list