[Gllug] 4G Memory Restriction
Nix
nix at esperi.org.uk
Mon Apr 10 15:57:21 UTC 2006
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Richard Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:33:43AM +0100, Tet wrote:
>> Of course, these days, AMD have now made the decision simple -- just
>> go straight to 64 bits. Do not pass go, do not collect 200 pounds.
>> Anything else just doesn't make sense in today's world.
>
> I'll second this one. Don't buy a new 32 bit processor now, unless
> you have some extremely specialised usage in mind (low power
> embedded?).
Does `ohshit I burned out my firewall and major server through stupidity
and static and need a cheap box really really fast, oh look on five
seconds scan of the shop here's a 200 quid Coppermine ten times faster
than the box I burned out' count?
(Not that this happened to me or anything.)
--
`On a scale of 1-10, X's "brokenness rating" is 1.1, but that's only
because bringing Windows into the picture rescaled "brokenness" by
a factor of 10.' --- Peter da Silva
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list