[Gllug] Interactive Documentation.

[James Roberts]

Peter Childs wrote:

> However a WYSIWYG tool that can handle long documents with proper
> version control and hyperlinks (for glossaries, contence etc) in them
> that work are non-exsistant and hence normal users are stuck using
> Word which is extremly sad. Its simular to the fact that I've seen
> many people running large complex databases in Excel (worse still Word
> Tables)!
> 
> If I had a cunning plan to write one I would but I've got no idea how
> it would work.


I am having rather similar problems with (supposedly) rather technical 
users who cannot manage MediaWiki. Mind you its formatting scheme is a pain.

I'm currently evaluating a mixture of DocuWiki 
(http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:dokuwiki) whose interface is very clean 
and offers easy editing, with Writely (http://www.writely.com/) for 
generating larger formatted html docs to drop into it with a more GUI 
feel. Might work for me: you could have a look.

MeJ
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug