[Gllug] Hardware comparisons
Richard Jones
rich at annexia.org
Fri Mar 23 19:36:35 UTC 2007
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 06:24:37PM +0000, Alain Williams wrote:
> I'm putting together a box for a customer, cost is not the primary
> concern (I'm replacing a 40K AIX box with a dual core AMD based box),
> stability/reliability are highly desirable ... might as well get it
> fast as well.
>
> There are a few choices, comments please:
>
> * They wanted SCSI, I had specified SATA ... is SCSI still worth
> the premium ? We will need a SCSI card for the DAT drive anyway.
Take a look at:
http://labs.google.com/papers/disk_failures.pdf
I would go for drives where the manufacturer is willing to give you a
long guarantee (5 years) on drives which they rate for 24/7 server
operation. WD RE2 perhaps - but check their "limited warranty".
> * Mirroring. Is this best done by the kernel or through a RAID controller ?
> I believe that if the kernel sees 2 drives it will do reads in parallel
> (I believe that computers read more often than they write); it is
> suggested that using a RAID controller will reduce bus bandwidth (write to
> controller once which writes to the disks twice) & so make the machine faster.
Many years ago now I did tests on this and found that software RAID
was 5 times faster than hardware RAID (2000-era Pentium IIs vs. ICP
Vortex cards and a really awful Dell RAID card). At the same time
everyone was claiming otherwise. If you can, get the cards on spec
and test them against the expected workload.
> * Memory. Both DDR2 dual channel:
> One supplier can provide: PC2-4200 (533MHz)
> The other: PC2-6400 - 800MHz
> Will the faster memory make a real difference ?
Are either/both of these ECC?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list