[Gllug] Oyster cards vulnerable?
Holger Duerer
hduerer at gmx.net
Sat Jan 26 12:07:37 UTC 2008
>>>>> "Martin" == Martin A Brooks <martin at hinterlands.org> writes:
Martin> Martin A. Brooks wrote:
>> Nix wrote:
>>
>>> There was another very important reason: it hugely improves
>>> flow around ticket barriers if most people use Oyster, because
>>> it takes a fraction of the time to validate the card as it
>>> does to feed a ticket through. (Normally about a fifth as
>>> long.)
>>>
>>
>> You've said this before, and you didn't produce any kind of
>> evidence to support this statistic then. Can you do so now?
>>
>> If anything, I think Oyster makes things faster, no ticket
>> orientation problems, for a start.
Martin> Oh, duh. I misread, sorry. We are in fact agreeing
Martin> mostly. I think Oyster _is_ faster, but I wouldn't say
Martin> you can get 5 Oysters through a barrier in the same time
Martin> it takes one paper ticket user.
That's not what he said. He said the scanning was 5 times as fast.
But I guess your misunderstanding shows how irrelevant that speed
improvement would be. Even if the machine could scan a card in a
nanosecond the human being would still require the split second or so
to pass the gate. And the mechanical gates are probably the slowest
thing in the system.
Holger
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list