[Gllug] Reply-To Header Mangling

[Matthew King]

Tethys <sta296 at astradyne.co.uk> writes:

>>This does make me think that I could do with a "If it's a list, and it
>>has Reply-To: set to the list, then only honour that for group reply" rule
>>embedded in my MUA -- time for a bit of googling about mutt, I suppose.
>
> Alternatively, unmangle the header with procmail/formail as it arrives...

But how do you use that to recover any original Reply-To header?

Matthew

-- 
I must take issue with the term "a mere child", for it has been my
invariable experience that the company of a mere child is infinitely
preferable to that of a mere adult.
                                           --  Fran Lebowitz
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug