[Gllug] Polipo - Was: Caching youtube videos
Nix
nix at esperi.org.uk
Sat Oct 4 12:01:30 UTC 2008
On 2 Oct 2008, David L. Neil Mailing list a. told this:
> Nix wrote:
>> Of course this just goes to show that you should be using Polipo instead
>> ;}
>
> Haven't come across this one before (which doesn't say a whole lot...).
It specializes in transport efficiency. unlike, say, wwwoffle (which
eliminates pipelining, doesn't cope with chunking properly and has all
sorts of horrible data-corruption bugs), Polipo often *increases* the
efficiency of data in transit, gzipping, chunking and pipelining even if
the client can't, seamlessly falling back if the far end messes up.
It's very nice. I can't think of a single webpage that failed to render
properly with it, again unlike wwwoffle.
(Also, unusually, it's designed to be installed *anywhere*: it doesn't
need a config file and doesn't need to be installed systemwide. Until
fairly recently it couldn't even write to syslog without going through
logger(1), but I fixed that :) )
> Am playing with TOR and thus installed Privoxy.
>
> Care to make any comment about Polipo cf Privoxy in such applications,
I don't use Privoxy, or Tor, but
<http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/polipo/polipo.html#Privoxy>
might be helpful. It looks like it seriously damages transport
efficiency (no pipelining? What the hell?)
> and maybe running it on a small network 'gateway' m/c so as to service a
> number of TOR-ified FF browsers?
You want to use a SOCKS parent proxy:
<http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/polipo/polipo.html#SOCKS-parent-proxies>.
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list