[Gllug] ed vs emacs/vi, was: ed vs emacs, was: OpenMoko Neo Freerunner
Bruce Richardson
itsbruce at workshy.org
Sun May 10 11:53:20 UTC 2009
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:39:19AM +0100, Alain wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 11:12:18AM +0100, Harry Rickards wrote:
>
> > I agree that people should learn to use either ed or echo, but isn't
> > there a vi clone in BusyBox, which IMHO everyone should have installed.
> > I don't know where the default location is, but for me BusyBox is
> > installed in /bin/busybox.
>
> Hmmm: just checked the busybox source ... their vi has the escape
> sequences for a vt102 nailed in - so that should work for your typical
> Linux console.
Even where utilities are in /bin or /sbin, developers/packagers can let
dependencies to files in /usr creep in. Not just in Linux, either;
FreeBSD has a set of binaries in /rescue to be used in recovery
situations, but feature creep means that some of these will not now work
if /usr is not mounted.
--
Bruce
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20090510/3b91c7ed/attachment.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list