[Gllug] ed vs emacs/vi, was: ed vs emacs, was: OpenMoko Neo Freerunner
Bruce Richardson
itsbruce at workshy.org
Sun May 10 09:39:57 UTC 2009
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 09:58:09AM +0100, Harry wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Sed was originally called gres, the idea being that it would do a very
> > similar job to grep but with substitution. Along the way, the developer
> > decided to add more functionality and he deliberately based the new
> > tool's command set on ed's commands because it had become so unversally
> > known; so he named the tool "sed" to reinforce that sense of
> > progression.
> >
> >
> Thanks for the explanation. So I sort of use sed all the time (with grep).
Not really, no. You were more correct to say that sed is ed for
streams. sed's *original* inspiration was the way in which grep focused
on one part of ed's functionality but then Lee McMahon realised that the
logical conclusion of that would be a whole series of specialised "gre*"
tools, each delivering a particular subset of ed's features, so he
expanded the purpose of gres and made sed.
--
Bruce
I object to intellect without discipline. I object to power without
constructive purpose. -- Spock
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20090510/0714f61d/attachment.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list