[Gllug] Recommendations for servers
j.roberts
j.roberts at stabilys.com
Thu Nov 25 11:45:59 UTC 2010
On 25/11/10 01:12, Christopher Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 00:48 +0000, Tethys wrote:
>> --------
>>
>> "j.roberts" writes:
>>
>>> Concerning servers, the build quality of HP is superb; the build quality
>>> of Dell very good (usually)
>>
>> Just for an opposing data point, I've had higher failure rates with
>> Dell than with any other vendor. And not just a little bit higher
>> either. Obviously YMMV.
>>
>> Tet
>
> The two vendors I've problems with are HP and Dell. I've bought more of
> their machines over the years than any other brands, but the rate of
> failure (particularly with more recent Dell hardware) is getting towards
> being appalling.
Interesting. I am not so keen on Dell but have had a lot of machines out
there for years with no problems (customer driven) and often you can't
argue with the deal price; HP is my first choice (had used to be IBM,
back in the day).
May I ask, which models/series of HP one has had difficulties with? I'll
look into sticking them on my 'avoid' list?
MeJ
--
Stabilys Ltd www.stabilys.com
244 Kilburn Lane
LONDON
W10 4BA
0845 838 5370
--
Gllug mailing list - Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug
More information about the GLLUG
mailing list