[Herts] Corrupt GPG signatures Re: ** Tonight **

[Ian Gregory]

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 06:43:36PM +0100, Ian Gregory wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:01:17PM +0100, Steve Clark wrote:
>
>>I've been trying to work out why my gpg signatures always come out 
>>as invalid when I post to this list. I'm using PGP/MIME encoding 
>>and part of the text for that is getting changes along the way.
>
>I wouldn't ordinarily sign list emails (what are people's views on 
>the practice?) but to provide another data point I am signing this 
>one (sent using Mutt which does it the MIME way by default).

Replying to my own message here. My signature was verified OK but there 
was a warning about part of the message not being signed. That was just 
because the list added a footer after I signed the message and was to be 
expected. 

Ian

-- 
Ian Gregory
http://www.zenatode.org.uk/