[Klug-general] Linux and Vista
Michael. E. Rentell
michael.rentell at ntlworld.com
Tue Feb 27 12:28:50 GMT 2007
Thanks for that Alan. It looks like I can go ahead as I wish.
I'm not paranoid, after all it is the other b.....s who are always out to get ya. :-) Hence the query.
The sooner I can help to get Sage Accounts 2007 version working under CrossOverOffice the happier I shall be.
MikeR
in Folkestone
In a nutshell, both XP and Vista check against the PC's components to
see if the machine has been changed to prevent multiple installations
with the same Install Code.
This has no effect on a Linux install on the same machine as the two are
totally unrelated.
Linux, Vista and XP co-exist well on the same PC as long as you aren't
using bitlocker. If you need to use bitlocker then you shouldn't be
thinking of creating a dual boot system in any event.
::a
-----Original Message-----
From: kent-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk
[mailto:kent-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk] On Behalf Of Michael. E.
Rentell
Sent: 27 February 2007 11:57
To: Kent Linux User Group
Subject: [Klug-general] Linux and Vista
I'm not sure what I mean either. But PC-Plus had a big splash about
Vista this month (of course) and one of the points is that it has much
more in the way of registration than XP had. Apparently it checks back
with the original registration on a regular basis just to convince
itself that it is still on the same machine and hasn't been ported to
another one illegally.
My question is to ask whether anyone has successfully added a Linux
partition to a Vista machine without triggering this activity. And also
what does 'this activity' actually do if Vista decides that it doesn't
like the host any more.
I'd really like a new 64bit machine, unfortunately I need Windows for a
bit longer and I don't want MS to kill my added Linux installation.
Does that make more sense? Sorry if I was a bit dense previously.
Also, I've posted my response above Alan's query. Is that considered bad
netiquette? That was new to me when I saw a flame here the other day. I
will try and change that practice if folks feel aggrieved.
Mike R
in Folkestone
Alan Pope wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:30:23AM +0000, Michael. E. Rentell wrote:
>> It comes, of course, with the Boy God's latest vsign operating
system
>> which, apparently, checks its registered installation parameters on
a
>> regular basis to prevent its being gnu-d (fat chance) without
permission.
>>
>
> Not sure I fully understand you there. Are you indicating that Vista
calls home and tells microsoft if you
> install other software?
>
> I have never heard of this and would not immediately believe it if I
did.
>
> Cheers,
> Al.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kent mailing list
> Kent at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent
>
_______________________________________________
Kent mailing list
Kent at mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent
_______________________________________________
Kent mailing list
Kent at mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent
More information about the Kent
mailing list