[Klug-general] A question for Kevin

[J D Freeman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:19:13PM +0000, Dan Attwood wrote:
> I though you mentioned they did a mini-itx blade server equivalent?
> may be I got the wrong end of the stick.
> 
> Still even so those dual motherboard 1 U server case could still be
> the basis of a cheap, energy efficient Citrix farm/ cluster.

This is why I wanted the link. However I am wondering if such a system
would actually be the most cost effective system in pure throughput
terms.

I suppose really it depends on what sort of thing you are trying to do
with such a cluster.

J
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFvljm42M0lILkmGIRAkk+AKD2002jO3FZZgd/yez1BmfoIE5XjACeKcFp
EroNcHYchWZRsJyA6e6EgOg=
=cihU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----