[Klug-general] SSL bug
Andy Smith
andy at lug.org.uk
Fri May 23 15:25:27 BST 2008
Hi,
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:00:55AM -0400, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> Well lets see what happens, from what I hear, people have lost faith in it.
Bit of a climb-down.
> People are switching... If you want to maintain your use then
> that's up to you,
Thanks Karl!
> Simply put you can't expect to maintain an enterprise market if a
> bunch of volunteers do the work that should be done and maintained
> by professionals. i.e. people who are paid and are accountable for
> their actions.
Debian has never targeted itself as an "enterprise" distribution.
And having used RHEL (extensively) and SuSE (some) I have to say I'm
glad. I don't think Debian's current users and developers want it
to be like that anyway.
I really do not see Debian taking any sort of major popularity hit
from this and I only see it being used as the base of more and more
offshoot distributions.
I am on a LOT of Linux lists and while I see the odd bit of concern
what I am mostly seeing is people saying things like "man this
really sucked, but I use Ubuntu anyway and don't want to change."
Cheers,
Andy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/kent/attachments/20080523/dca4dce0/attachment.bin
More information about the Kent
mailing list