[Klug-general] one server or to have dedicated servers for each task?

[Etenil]

Wow, zimbra's really impressive.

However, that's not good enough for the file hosting. My users really
need this as most of the job we do is on spreadsheets and word-processed
documents.

I guess I could use a server for email/webhosting and another as
fileserver.

Thank you all for your advice.

Guillaume


-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Snow <snow.rob at gmail.com>
Reply-To: Kent Linux User Group - General Topics
<kent at mailman.lug.org.uk>
To: Kent Linux User Group - General Topics <kent at mailman.lug.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Klug-general] one server or to have dedicated servers for
each task?
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:19:11 +0100

Apologies  if you have already come across this, but you might want to
look at http://www.zimbra.com/products/  The Zimbra Collaboration Suite
might offer a one stop shop for what you need.

Regards

Rob

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Dan Attwood <danattwood at googlemail.com>
wrote:
        You might want to look at what the samba shares actually contain
        and then consider if they actually need to be samba shares. 
        
        
        For example if they only actually contain a small set of working
        documents then they might be served up via an intranet type
        site. Consider Knowledge tree, Drupal and the novell sharepoint
        alternative I can't remember the name. The other advantage of
        this route is that the website, email via webmail and document
        management all become one and the same which is nice form an end
        user point of view.
        
        _______________________________________________
        Kent mailing list
        Kent at mailman.lug.org.uk
        https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent


_______________________________________________
Kent mailing list
Kent at mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent