[Klug-general] Re-branding the 'L' in LUG

[Thomas Edward Groves]

Personally I only come along to remind myself that it is perfectly ok
to be a techie (or chose alternative label to taste).
So as long as we don't start concentrating on just one subject
(games, networking, GUI, even command line) I'm a happy man.

Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: sharon kimble <boudiccas at talktalk.net>
To: Kent Linux User Group - General Topics <kent at mailman.lug.org.uk>
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 10:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Klug-general] Re-branding the 'L' in LUG


> On Monday 03 October 2011 21:46:33 James Morris wrote:
> > On 3 October 2011 21:40, James Morris <jwm.art.net at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Please tell me you don't you seriously expect
> > >
> > > http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=OS%26U
> > >
> > > to lead to meaningful results?
> > >
> > > Please tell me you're not making decisions about what can and can't be
> > > mentioned in K*UG "marketing"....
> >
> > <<sorry forgot to finish the sentence>>
> >
> > Please tell me you're not making decisions about what can and can't be
> > mentioned in KLUG "marketing" based on those search results.
> >
> >
> Why are you having these discussions? It aint broke so why try to fix it?
It
> doesnt make sense to me, its working so why fiddle with it?
>
> Take care
> Sharon.
> --
> A taste of linux = http://www.sharons.org.uk/taste/index.html
> efever = http://www.efever.blogspot.com/
> efever = http://sharon04.livejournal.com/
> Debian 6,0.2, KDE 4.4.5, LibreOffice 3.4.3
> Registered Linux user 334501
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kent mailing list
> Kent at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent