[Lancaster] Help me select a distrob
Ken Hough
kenhough at uklinux.net
Tue Apr 18 21:44:05 BST 2006
max* wrote:
> Hi HAB
>
> Not easy to choose :-)
>
snip
>
> SuSE, although very good in lots of ways, (and near to my heart as my first
> distribution about 10 yrs ago), is quite non-standard in too many areas,
There's an awfull lot of people who would disagree with you on that one.
and
> mixing the wizards
What do you mean? Practically everything can be done via YAST. Simple!
and hand tuning is not recommended. (although this is
> getting much better).
I've done hand tuning under SuSE. It's not a problem, provided that you
take note of any messages in the config files (usually at the heads of
the files).
I suggest that there very few distros which can now be considered to be
'standard', whatever that might now mean. Different people prefer
different distros. The fact is that SuSE now has a very good reputation.
It's one of the easiest to use and to configure.
You might be interested in a 'Distro Hit List' produced by
DistroWatch.com and recently published in Linux Format. This sets out to
monitor the popularity of distros based on the number of visits to each
distro specific page. The figures are:
Ubuntu 2618
SuSE 1901
Fedora Core 1494
Mandriva 1169
Gentoo 869
Mepis 861
Damm Small 836
Debian 785
Knoppix 717
Slackware 612
Bearing in mind the number of Ubuntu CDs that have been freely sprinkled
around the world, it's no surprise that this distro is at the top of the
list.
>
> Fedora - i just find confusing these days. they just seem to be wandering
> around thinking "ah yes, that'd be nice." (which isn't unusual when it comes
> to choosing software, but is confusing when they can't make their minds up
> about which graphical front end for installing software they promote).
>
> Result: i usually recommend ubuntu. it has lots of wikis, newsgroups and
> howtos - all of which are really important.
So has SuSE. A lot!
Ken Hough
More information about the Lancaster
mailing list