[Lancaster] Twitter

Richard Robinson llug_6a at beulah.qualmograph.org.uk
Sat Feb 21 16:03:50 UTC 2009


On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 03:33:14PM +0000, Ken Hough wrote:
> On Saturday 21 February 2009 15:00:34 Richard Robinson wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > And I suggest that that isn't always, necessarily, so. Ghandi, Stallman,
> > whoever, could equally well be presented as working in their own
> > self-interest as well as to others' benefit - the interesting point about
> > them then being that they managed to find their way to an understanding of
> > their interest that offered gains to other eople rather than the loss Ken
> > seems to assume is inevitable.
> 
> Where did I say that 'loss' was inevitable?
> 
> I tried to argue that powerful interests could produce gains for many, but 
> that not all would be pleased with the results or the means used.
> 
> I daresay that we could we could go on and on and on .....................
> 
> I've said my bit.

Okay

-- 
Richard Robinson
"The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem




More information about the Lancaster mailing list