[Liverpool] BookCrossing

[Bob Ham]

On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 10:57 +0000, Tom Hall wrote:
> 
> Wow Bob, your 3 step method is amazing. You could maybe add
...
> Clear?

Not really, no but what is clear is that there's a basic difference in
how we go about reading books.  I have a list of specific books to read
in future whereas BookCrossing seems to be based in an unrestricted
mode.  My reading is explicitly and consciously directed whereas the
reading of a BookCrosser seems to be undirected and left to chance.

Interesting.

-- 
Bob Ham <rah at bash.sh>

for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/liverpool/attachments/20100401/d17cca98/attachment.pgp