[Liverpool] Iceweasel

[Bob Ham]

On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 21:04 +0100, Michael Dorrington wrote:
> On 11/08/11 11:35, Bob Ham wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 09:08 +0100, Andrew Williams wrote:

> >> I remember (vaugely) that Mozilla did extend a license to to use the branding
> >> to Debian but they rejected it, it seemed (to me) a bit more PR flag waving
> >> than actual problem solving.
> > 
> > It taken nearly two years but I just realised what the problem is
> > here :-)  Mozilla provided a license to Debian but not to authors of
> > derivatives (or even other builders).  That means if a Debian user built
> > the source code for Debian's version of Firefox, they would not have the
> > right to distribute the resulting binaries.
> > 

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation_software_rebranded_by_the_Debian_project

Yes, I looked at this page after sending my email and saw the original
description was.. overly vague :-)

-- 
Bob Ham <rah at bash.sh>

for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/liverpool/attachments/20110811/bcccb8f2/attachment.pgp>