[Liverpool] Wed 6th Meeting

[Adrian McEwen]

Cool.  All hail our new glorious leader... (just kidding/winding up Bob, 
but thanks for taking the lead on getting website/etc. sorted :-)

I'll forward the announcement on to NWDC-announce, DoES and NW hackspace 
groups when I get it.

Cheers,

Adrian.

On 04/07/11 16:07, Dan Lynch wrote:
>
> Sounds good to me, nice work Bob.
>
> Dan
>
> On Jul 4, 2011 4:06 PM, "Bob Ham" <rah at bash.sh> wrote:
> > OK, it looks like we're heading toward Adrian + Administative Meeting.
> > Sebastian gets another reprieve ;-) I'll send the announcement. And
> > put together an agenda :-)
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 15:27 +0100, Adrian McEwen wrote:
> >> Yeah, 15 mins should be about right for my talk. Obviously everyone
> >> will want to sign up and get involved immediately, but I'll try some
> >> sort of Google-style invite limiting system to build buzz and reduce
> >> the over-run in time... ;-)
> >>
> >> Adrian.
> >>
> >> On 04/07/11 12:06, Dan Lynch wrote:
> >> > I don't mind. We definitely need to have this discussion about
> >> > future direction and housekeeping stuff for LivLUG. I assumed we'd
> >> > do that afterwards at the pub but thinking about it now we may be
> >> > better off doing it at LSC. It gets noisy in the pub, people tend to
> >> > get into their own separate conversations. It should probably be on
> >> > the agenda for LSC, if we have one.
> >> >
> >> > How long do you think you'd be talking for Adrian? I thought it
> >> > would be more of a quick pitch thing, 15mins.
> >> >
> >> > If Sebastian has prepared stuff and planned to do an Asterisk demo
> >> > this month that's different, I don't want him to feel there's wasted
> >> > effort. Besides, I want to see it! If on the other hand it was more
> >> > of an afterthought then perhaps pushing it back to next month and
> >> > giving it a full session is a good idea.
> >> >
> >> > It's up to you guys really, depends how you both feel. That was
> >> > helpful wasn't it? Hehehehe
> >> >
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Adrian McEwen <adrian at mcqn.net 
> <mailto:adrian at mcqn.net>>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > Morning,
> >> >
> >> > It would be good to fill you all in with what we're up to
> >> > with DoES Liverpool at some point, but happy to run it next
> >> > month if we'd rather? I haven't prepared anything as such,
> >> > but was probably going to just tweak the slides that John
> >> > McKerrell used when he talked about it at GeekUp last week.
> >> >
> >> > Are we having a "future of LivLUG" discussion this month?
> >> > If so it might make more sense for me to talk this month,
> >> > because it's not a particularly long talk, and then we'd
> >> > save a full session for Sebastian?
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> > Adrian.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 04/07/11 09:18, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> >> > I can do the second part of the Asterisk talk (well,
> >> > more of a hands-on session this one, really) - but
> >> > I'm equally happy to wait until next month if Adrian
> >> > has stuff prepared.
> >> >
> >> > Sebastian
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 04/07/11 01:05, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> > Dan Lynch <biglynchy at gmail.com <mailto:biglynchy at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Just wanted to check what's happening
> >> > with the meeting this
> >> > Wednesday. Do we have any plans? I
> >> > presume we go to the social
> >> > centre as usual and then on somewhere
> >> > else. Is there any talk
> >> > planned or anything?
> >> >
> >> > Adrian has been doing some interesting
> >> > stuff lately creating a hack
> >> > space in Liverpool and bringing techy
> >> > types together. It's all
> >> > moving forward. Maybe we could get him to
> >> > fill us in on that?
> >> > Probably not a full length talk, just
> >> > something to give us the gist.
> >> > He mentioned something about it today and
> >> > I decided to volunteer
> >> > him, he seems ok with it.
> >> >
> >> > What does everyone think?
> >> >
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Is Seb continuing his Asterisk talk?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Liverpool mailing list
> >> > Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> >> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Liverpool mailing list
> >> > Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> >> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Liverpool mailing list
> >> > Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> >> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Liverpool mailing list
> >> > Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> >> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Liverpool mailing list
> >> Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> >> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
> >
> > --
> > Bob Ham <rah at bash.sh>
> >
> > for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Liverpool mailing list
> Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/liverpool/attachments/20110704/2e5ef072/attachment-0001.htm>