[Liverpool] Potential Venue Change For Future Meetings

[Andrew Bates]

I'll cast my vote in and say I'm for the move from the LSC to DoES. As has
already been said, the facilities are much more in line with what we are
all about, but I think the number one reason for me is the access issue -
no more shall we have to wait outside for upwards of 30 mins whilst we all
wait for someone to open up the space!

On 8 May 2015 at 08:58, Sebastian Arcus <s.arcus at open-t.co.uk> wrote:

> On 07/05/15 16:24, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 09:27:56 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>  As not everyone has been to DoES, maybe we could hold the next meeting
>>> there and then discuss whether to make the change permanent.
>>>
>> Well, we've been there now so it's time for a decision.
>>
>> What do you all think, LSC or DoES?
>>
>> In my best Joe Strummer voice "should we stay or should we go?".
>>
> Well - it's a nice space, good facilities, the guys at DoES are nice and
> welcoming (I want an extra cake for that plug, Adrian ;-) ), there are
> opportunities of cross-pollination with what they do and what we do. I
> can't really think of any reason not to do it
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Liverpool mailing list
> Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/liverpool/attachments/20150508/2bb7f1a7/attachment.html>