[Nottingham] Debian devotion [was: OE Reply Fixer]
James Duncan
nottingham at mailman.lug.org.uk
Thu Mar 6 00:44:06 2003
Robert Davies wrote:
>On Wednesday 05 March 2003 20:53, you wrote:
>
>
>>Robert Davies wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Wednesday 05 March 2003 17:23, you wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Martin Garton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, .waffle wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
>
>>>My problem was, I needed a 'Fresh' release, packages that had been tested
>>>reasonably and passed from unstable, that would add new software, and
>>>major releases of things like Destkops, which don't impact underlying
>>>server code.
>>>
>>>
>>Like testing maybe? Packages go to this when they have cleared
>>unstable, though I use unstable without problems. It is worth noting
>>that unstable packages have already been proven stable in the
>>experimental distribution, and I have had my machine broken exactly 0
>>times tracking sid (unstable) pretty much daily. IMHO the name does a
>>lot to put people off but it is as stable as say mandrake.
>>
>>
>
>testing may live on after sid was created, but woody was the only game in
>town when it was unstable and Potatoe was the current stable version. At
>times woody *was* very broken. Those who did use it told me at LUG meetings
>they had to keep an eye on the lists and only make 'fairweather' updates,
>I've also seen serious breakage at times reported in uk.os.linux.
>
>So when Woody came out officially, I think I'd already been happily using
>another distro for 18 months, and have no reason to change. Gentoo has
>aroused my interest again in trying another distro out, but I don't see any
>advantages of Debian over what I have currently installed, and quite a few
>disadvantages.
>
>There's a well known psychological reason that can explain fandom and
>devotion. Basically if you have to put a lot into something, then because
>you have time invested, you are fully bought in and committed. To feel it
>wasn't worth the effort implies you wasted your time. It's much easier to
>slag off what automatic tools do, as you've not 'bought into them' with your
>own efforts.
>
>I liked Debian myself a lot when I had it, it was only really the slow
>release cycle and lack of near to state of art stable releases, that made me
>cut my losses and buy a commercial distro.
>
>Rob
>
>_______________________________________________
>Nottingham mailing list
>Nottingham@mailman.lug.org.uk
>http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/nottingham
>
>
No, don't get me wrong, I think Debian could do with a 'wizarding', at
least as an option. To be honest my main love of Debian is for
idealistic reasons.