[Nottingham] CMS / HTML editors

[Tom Bird]

Cam wrote:
> Graeme
> 
>> Oh well. Maybe it's back to Vi then!
> 
> vim with syntax highlighting, or emacs, do well with HTML, XML and CSS. 
> I can't imagine using a WYSIWYG editor... surely you'd still need to 
> check your work in a real browser sooner or later, why not cut out the 
> middle man?

Seconded, for vim.  :syntax on -- for anyone that's not seen the syntax 
highlighting.  It's lovely, although I did have to jump through some 
hoops to make it work at work where we use HP-UX.  It's another story.

Tom