[Nottingham] /proc vs /sys ?

Martin martin at ml1.co.uk
Thu May 24 12:59:23 BST 2007

Roger Light wrote:
> On 23/05/07, Martin <martin at ml1.co.uk> wrote:
>> sysfs /sys is supposedly to take over from /proc...
> My understanding was that sysfs was intended purely to move devices
> out of proc, not replace it completely. I'd expect /proc/meminfo to
> remain in /proc.

Thanks for that... I'd missed that nuance.

I can continue to code with a clear conscience oncemore that it might
all continue to work for some time yet... ;-)


Martin Lomas
martin at ml1.co.uk

More information about the Nottingham mailing list