[Nottingham] NHS care.data ('Anonymized' data really isn't - and here's why not)

[Martin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/05/14 14:06, Jason Irwin wrote:
> Excuse me whilst I wake the dead.

The maillist or the Lords? ;-)


> The Lords just rejected a proposal to place some protections on 
> care.data it seems: 
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/05/08/care_bill_amendments_for_statutory_oversight_on_data_handling_rejected_by_government_peers/

Another
> 
ouch for that trail...

There are some 'choice' quotes in there...


Is that now a game of public apathy and a deliberate blindness to the
'small detail' that "pseudo-anonymous" in effect means "NOT-anonymous"?...

Bad puns aside: that's it, more than ever I'm convinced!


Thanks for that,

Cheers,
Martin

- -- 
- - ------------------ - ----------------------------------------
- -    Martin Lomas    - OpenPGP (GPG/PGP) Public Key: 0xCEE1D3B7
- - martin @ ml1 co uk - Import from   hkp://subkeys.pgp.net   or
- - ------------------ - http:// ml1 .co .uk/martin_ml1_co_uk.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlNruzIACgkQ+sI3Ds7h07dlwgCbBwJ/g06cAdoqiOR5rlMN4Zlk
9BgAn0Av5w0P0avUfvQy0KjCcSdZMZsz
=L7vc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----