[Preston] Building Modular Kernels
Andrew King
andrew at andrewsworld.org
Tue Mar 16 13:17:24 GMT 2004
Hi there,
If you have plenty of memory (eg 128MB+), is there any point in having a
modular kernel over just compiling everything straight in? I know that
modules allow memory to be saved when those parts of the kernel aren't
needed, but isn't that just as in saving a bit of kernel code from being
loaded, which is surely just a couple of megs at the most? I'm planning
on just switching back to compiling everything straight in for a while
in the interests of making life easier, but just wondering if there's
any major reason that we're supposed to use modules for that I've forgot.
Kernel 2.6 has gone okay... have got alsa working, and a couple of other
things, but noticed no performance increase (that's with pre-emptible
kernel enabled) - but no loss either.
Thanks,
Andrew
More information about the Preston
mailing list