[SC.LUG] Emacs vs Vi vs csh vs bash

[Martyn Kinder]

But there is nothing you could possibly say about emacs that would make anyone laugh.

KM 


===================
Martyn Kinder G0CZD
===================

Web: 
http://www.czd.org.uk

Microwave Directory:
http://www.czd.org.uk/radio/uwd/index.html



-----Original Message-----
From: sc-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk [mailto:sc-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk] On Behalf Of Robert Marshall
Sent: 14 January 2005 16:29
To: South Cheshire GNU/Linux Users
Subject: Re: [SC.LUG] Emacs vs Vi vs csh vs bash

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Martyn Kinder wrote:

> Not original - but as its only text I thought that I would share it 
> with you rather than wasting index finger energy opening new browsers.

This is false pretences - there are no mentions of emacs in this! Googling reveals that only the French version has this

Comme on peut tout faire en emacs, il suffit de taper:

M-x tirer-dans-le-pied

après avoir mis dans son .emacs :

(require 'armes)

(require 'parties-du-corps)

(autoload 'tirer-dans-le-pied "tirer-dans-le-pied.el"

          "Pour se tirer dans le pied." t)

(at http://bp.noos.org/computer/shootyourself.php3)

There doesn't appear to be a vi version but maybe that's too easy.

gd&r

Robert
--
Links and things http://rmstar.blogspot.com/ Robert Marshall

_______________________________________________
SC mailing list
SC at mailman.lug.org.uk
http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/sc