FW: [sclug] Firewalls

[Tom Dawes-Gamble]

Hi,

tim wrote:

> 2. Could not seem to get the NAT working on ipcop. My local addresses
> 192nnnnnn seemed to leak out into the net, which seemed good in some ways
> in that sites thought my ip address was 192 etc, but bad in the fact that
> I was not doing it deliberately and I am sure its not good generally.
> 

Strange.  I would have thought that if your 192. adddress leaked
out then the connection would fail since the remote end would not have a
route to your 192.



Tom.

-- 
There are 10 sorts of people.
Those that understand Binary and those that don't.