[sclug] Gave up on Gentoo
Alex Butcher
lug at assursys.co.uk
Sun Nov 28 13:19:26 UTC 2004
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Simon Huggins wrote:
> But yeah, ask some of the Redhat/Fedora, Mandrake, Suse, Slackware or
> Gentoo crowd why they don't run it. I imagine some of the responses
> you'll get for Debian will be "it's old software" because Debian itself
> is well overdue a release. Ubuntu doesn't have that problem though.
As a RH user since 1995:
- stable is too stale, testing is too unsupported, and unstable is too scary
- RH has more traction in the workplaces I've been, so I only need to know
one distro, along with Windows and Solaris to cover all the significant
bases.
- the signing of Debian packages isn't as consistent as Red Hat/Fedora's.
- erratic handling of security updates (e.g. IIRC, in *stable*, an Apache
fix broke some webmail package, and it didn't get fixed for a number of
months - that could well be a showstopper in a consultancy situation; who
pays for the remedial work - either migrating to a new, working, webmail
package, or fixing up the original one?).
- hard for non-Debian developers to understand the release/support schedule.
RHEL offers end-of-life dates for updates. Debian does too, but
only until <time of next release> + <period>. That's hard to plan around
in an enterprise environment.
- I'm used to RH, and all its quirks, now. :-)
On Debian's advantages:
+ massive package repository, and all packages considered part of the
distro, so they generally all work together. The reason apt works so well
is because the packages are well made - not because apt is a particularly
clever bit of software.
+ will always be Free, no ifs, no buts.
For the last reason, Debian has had more of my money than RH, even though I
don't use Debian. It's my backup plan.
> Simon.
Best Regards,
Alex.
--
Alex Butcher Brainbench MVP for Internet Security: www.brainbench.com
Bristol, UK Need reliable and secure network systems?
PGP/GnuPG ID:0x271fd950 <http://www.assursys.com/>
More information about the Sclug
mailing list