[sclug] Audio stream recording.

[JRKnight]

Well, I don't know about decoding audio-streams: a routine to decode
the compressed form of English (originally a 4GL with sophisticated
structures) in use here would be a challenge. What do we make of (1)?
Are the Unspeakable really in pursuit of software now, rather than the
Uneatable?
What was LW doing with the Hunt anyway - supping or sabbing?
       [c.f.  possible meanings of the term 'No Fly Zone']
And (2) presents no problem if you can still distinguish between people
and objects [e.g. don't use 'that' for 'who/whom'].  I should point out that
an imperative never stands up (although your  Counsel almost certainly
would).
yrs, Knight Invisible c/o Castell Perilous

(1)
>On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 10:04:33AM +0100, Leon Ward wrote:
>> Someone at the meet last night was looking for software that could
>> connect to audio-streams and save them locally, see below.

(2)
Keith Edmunds wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:17:49 +0100 (BST)

> Damion Yates <damiony at rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> > If received
> > in error, please advise the sender and delete/destroy it immediately.
> Bit rude to refer to the sender as "it", but does the panel think that the
> above imperative would stand up as a defence in the Old Bailey?
> _______________________________________________
> sclug mailing list
> sclug at sclug.org.uk
> http://www.sclug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/sclug