[sclug] DSPAM vs SpamAssassin?

[Simon Huggins]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 05:08:22PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> Subject line says it all, recently --- my SA + greylister setup seems to be 
> becoming less and less effective, and I've been considering switching to 
> DSPAM + greylister instead. Is this worth it? Any horror stories anyone wants 
> to share?

In my experience dspam actually works whereas spam assassin doesn't as
it doesn't really adapt.  dspam does however eat all my disk (even if I
do clean my old tokens out).

-- 
 ,--huggie-at-earth-dot-li--------stuff-thing-stuff----------DF5CE2B4--.
_|  <forc3> zsh je trouve ke tu passes plus de temps a faire la conf   |_
 |                           k'a l'utiliser                            |
 `- http://www.earth.li/~huggie/ - http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/ -'
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.tmdg.co.uk/pipermail/sclug/attachments/20050831/ff6cbe8c/attachment.bin